Sickened by a horrific, random act of violence here in Philadelphia this week, I found myself wondering about the effect on the body of being relentlessly exposed to violent images, as so many people are simply by watching TV and movies in the 21st century. I was thinking that surely this exposure via the mind has ancillary effects not only on behavior but on the body itself somehow.
I did some quick Googling and discovered something called The Mind Body Awareness Project. While this organization does not relate directly to my question, it turns out to relate very directly to my tragic inspiration. The Mind Body Awareness Project "is a non-profit organization dedicated to teaching essential life skills to at-risk youth through the practices of meditation and yoga," according to the site.
What happened here the other day was this. Four teenagers attacked a man at a subway station for this reason: they had nothing to do, and just thought they'd go beat this guy up. Turns out he died of a stress-induced asthma seizure. The man was in his late 30s; he was a mild-mannered, hard-working Starbucks employee. Life ended by four young men who would've been called "droogs" in A Clockwork Orange; Anthony Burgess may have had no idea how realistic his dystopian masterpiece might turn out to be. We have raised a sub-species of human being within our midst and I can't believe that the violence we strew so casually throughout our entertainment is unrelated to the existence of people who seem to have had their humanity removed when it comes to the casual use of exceptional violence.
At the same time, I know for a fact there are groups of very good and very helpful people in the world--for instance, the folks behind the Mind Body Awareness Project. Had they been working with the kids who committed this stupid, senseless crime, one man would have been spared a frightening and pointless death.
The incident like the one I've described saddens me to my core, but it does not leave me defeated. We can and must do better than this. Think about the violence you expose yourself to and ask yourself if you can do better than that.
Friday, March 28, 2008
Tuesday, March 25, 2008
Newsweek on the placebo effect
Here's another mainstream media take on placebos. Sharon Begley acknowledges from the outset how resistant both doctors and patients can be about the very concept of the placebo effect. Then she writes:
"But the fact remains that placebos are at least somewhat effective and sometimes very effective for some patients. Rather than railing against that finding or pretending it doesn't exist, what we should be doing is learning how brain activity that corresponds to the expectation of cure translates into clinical improvement."
I remain rather flabbergasted that so many people would rather ignore evidence that placebos often work than figure out what exactly is going on. How odd that the doctors who require clinical evidence before drawing conclusions on treatment will nevertheless overlook or disavow knowledge of clinical evidence that has proven, over and over, that placebos can and do work under many circumstances. So it's not clinical proof they really want; what they really want, like so many of us, is to have their own preconceived ideas to be continually affirmed.
"But the fact remains that placebos are at least somewhat effective and sometimes very effective for some patients. Rather than railing against that finding or pretending it doesn't exist, what we should be doing is learning how brain activity that corresponds to the expectation of cure translates into clinical improvement."
I remain rather flabbergasted that so many people would rather ignore evidence that placebos often work than figure out what exactly is going on. How odd that the doctors who require clinical evidence before drawing conclusions on treatment will nevertheless overlook or disavow knowledge of clinical evidence that has proven, over and over, that placebos can and do work under many circumstances. So it's not clinical proof they really want; what they really want, like so many of us, is to have their own preconceived ideas to be continually affirmed.
Sunday, March 23, 2008
Friday quotation (on a Sunday)
"What an abyss of uncertainty, whenever the mind feels overtaken by itself; when it, the seeker, is at the same time the dark region through which it must go seeking and where all its equipment will avail it nothing."
- Marcel Proust, Swann's Way
- Marcel Proust, Swann's Way
Thursday, March 20, 2008
Dr. Howard Schubiner
Dr. Howard Schubiner, one of a handful of doctors who has joined Dr. John Sarno in discussing and treating TMS, has a notable new web site up and running. The site presents a clear overview of TMS, including four video presentations.
The site also has an online course available, for a fee. Whether or not you feel inclined to sign up (the cost is $250), the web site is definitely worth a visit for anyone seeking more information about the mind-body connection in general, and its relation to this condition that has been labeled TMS by Sarno and his followers.
The site also has an online course available, for a fee. Whether or not you feel inclined to sign up (the cost is $250), the web site is definitely worth a visit for anyone seeking more information about the mind-body connection in general, and its relation to this condition that has been labeled TMS by Sarno and his followers.
Friday, March 14, 2008
Friday quotation
"If we are open only to discoveries which will accord with what we know already, we may as well stay shut."
- Alan Watts, The Wisdom of Insecurity
- Alan Watts, The Wisdom of Insecurity
Thursday, March 13, 2008
New study: back pain largely mind-induced
In the Daily Mail, a British paper, an article about new research that claims that most back pain is not from actual physical injury. (Note that this is no news to TMS sufferers, or followers of Dr. John Sarno.)
The study was specifically looking at trends in health following the reunification of Germany in the early '90s.
Shortly after East and West Germany were reunited, statistics show that 84 percent of West Germans were affected by back pain, compared to 69 percent of East Germans. By 2003, the percentages has just about equalized.
What accounted for the rise in back pain among residents of the former East Germany? "Researchers blame increased exposure to media reports on how back pain could be a severely disabling condition," says the Daily Mail, and quoted the published study directly:
"After reunification, all those 'myths' and misconceptions about back pain being pervasive in Western societies immediately spread to East Germany."
The study claims that only about 15 percent of back pain is actually due to a structural problem of some kind.
The Daily Mail found not too much receptivity to this idea at home, however. "British experts said if back pain is all in the mind, this is only true in a very few cases."
And right here is exactly why so many people seem to reject out of hand the idea of mind-induced pain, because it's often said to be "all in the mind." Neither traditional doctors nor many patients want to be told this because the implication is that the pain is somehow imaginary.
So let's be clear here: when people talk about the mind creating pain, this does not mean the pain is "all in the mind." The pain is still very much in the body.
Personally, I don't see what's so hard to understand about this, but it seems to trip lots and lots of people up. They hear about how the mind may create pain and think that means someone's basically making it all up.
In the case of back pain this is completely not true. The pain is real, and really happening in your body. Mind-induced pain is real, physical pain. Just like mind-induced embarrassment can turn your actual cheeks actually red.
The study was specifically looking at trends in health following the reunification of Germany in the early '90s.
Shortly after East and West Germany were reunited, statistics show that 84 percent of West Germans were affected by back pain, compared to 69 percent of East Germans. By 2003, the percentages has just about equalized.
What accounted for the rise in back pain among residents of the former East Germany? "Researchers blame increased exposure to media reports on how back pain could be a severely disabling condition," says the Daily Mail, and quoted the published study directly:
"After reunification, all those 'myths' and misconceptions about back pain being pervasive in Western societies immediately spread to East Germany."
The study claims that only about 15 percent of back pain is actually due to a structural problem of some kind.
The Daily Mail found not too much receptivity to this idea at home, however. "British experts said if back pain is all in the mind, this is only true in a very few cases."
And right here is exactly why so many people seem to reject out of hand the idea of mind-induced pain, because it's often said to be "all in the mind." Neither traditional doctors nor many patients want to be told this because the implication is that the pain is somehow imaginary.
So let's be clear here: when people talk about the mind creating pain, this does not mean the pain is "all in the mind." The pain is still very much in the body.
Personally, I don't see what's so hard to understand about this, but it seems to trip lots and lots of people up. They hear about how the mind may create pain and think that means someone's basically making it all up.
In the case of back pain this is completely not true. The pain is real, and really happening in your body. Mind-induced pain is real, physical pain. Just like mind-induced embarrassment can turn your actual cheeks actually red.
Wednesday, March 12, 2008
Presuming cause and effect--an ongoing theme
"Older men with lower free testosterone levels in their blood appear to have higher prevalence of depression," according to new research in Australia, as reported in Science Daily.
This kind of linking of body chemistry to mental health goes on all the time in our biochemical-crazy age. And there's nothing wrong with linking, but our cultural predisposition is to go immediately from "link" to "cause," and that's where the mishigas starts. Here:
"A total of 203 of the participants (5.1 percent) met criteria for depression; these men had significantly lower total and free testosterone levels then men who were not depressed. After controlling for other factors--such as education level, body mass index and cognitive scores--men in the lowest quintile (20 percent) of free testosterone concentration had three times the odds of having depression compared to men in the highest quintile."
See how the biochemical fact of having low testosterone and the psychological fact of having depression (this would be a straightforward link) is converted--without any evidence--to a cause when it's phrased this way: that men with the lowest testosterone have "three times the odds of having depression." This makes it sound like low testosterone may lead to depression when it's more likely, to anyone who understands the mind-body connection, that it's the depression that leads to the low testosterone levels.
The fact that the researchers talk immediately about the treatment implications of the finding--they want to do a trial to see if treating depressed men with extra testosterone helps them--shows that as far as they're concerned, cause and effect is a done deal: low testosterone causes depression, adding testosterone to depressed men will undepress them.
It's truly hard for me to remember that people think this way, and that those people have been in charge of our view of health, and our health care system, for a long time. They see the chemical sign of a mental or emotional state and relentlessly (and, I contend, harmfully) presume--without an apparent second thought--that the chemistry causes the mental or emotional state.
Even though it is clear to an elementary school student that our mental or emotional state can obviously and clearly cause changes to our bodies. Our bodies are made up of chemicals. There is no reason not to conclude that our mental or emotional states can cause chemical changes in our bodies.
As for the potential for harm: if it's depression causing the low testosterone, there's resume to believe that additional testosterone will root out the depression, while we cannot know the side effects of fiddling with our body's chemistry unnecessarily.
This kind of linking of body chemistry to mental health goes on all the time in our biochemical-crazy age. And there's nothing wrong with linking, but our cultural predisposition is to go immediately from "link" to "cause," and that's where the mishigas starts. Here:
"A total of 203 of the participants (5.1 percent) met criteria for depression; these men had significantly lower total and free testosterone levels then men who were not depressed. After controlling for other factors--such as education level, body mass index and cognitive scores--men in the lowest quintile (20 percent) of free testosterone concentration had three times the odds of having depression compared to men in the highest quintile."
See how the biochemical fact of having low testosterone and the psychological fact of having depression (this would be a straightforward link) is converted--without any evidence--to a cause when it's phrased this way: that men with the lowest testosterone have "three times the odds of having depression." This makes it sound like low testosterone may lead to depression when it's more likely, to anyone who understands the mind-body connection, that it's the depression that leads to the low testosterone levels.
The fact that the researchers talk immediately about the treatment implications of the finding--they want to do a trial to see if treating depressed men with extra testosterone helps them--shows that as far as they're concerned, cause and effect is a done deal: low testosterone causes depression, adding testosterone to depressed men will undepress them.
It's truly hard for me to remember that people think this way, and that those people have been in charge of our view of health, and our health care system, for a long time. They see the chemical sign of a mental or emotional state and relentlessly (and, I contend, harmfully) presume--without an apparent second thought--that the chemistry causes the mental or emotional state.
Even though it is clear to an elementary school student that our mental or emotional state can obviously and clearly cause changes to our bodies. Our bodies are made up of chemicals. There is no reason not to conclude that our mental or emotional states can cause chemical changes in our bodies.
As for the potential for harm: if it's depression causing the low testosterone, there's resume to believe that additional testosterone will root out the depression, while we cannot know the side effects of fiddling with our body's chemistry unnecessarily.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)